Argument Analytics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Rapid growth in the area of argument mining has resulted in an ever increasing volume of analysed argument data. Being able to store information about arguments people make in favour or against different opinions, decisions and actions is a highly valuable resource, yet extremely challenging for sense-making. How, for example, can an analyst quickly check whether in a corpus of citizen dialogue people tend to rather agree or disagree with new policies proposed by the department of transportation; how can she get an insight into the interactions typical of this specific dialogical context; how can the general public easily see which presidential candidate is currently winning the debate by being able to successfully defend his arguments? In this paper, we propose Argument Analytics – a suite of techniques which provide interpretation of, and insight into, large-scale argument data for both specialist and general audiences.
منابع مشابه
Aristotle on Circular Proof
In Posterior Analytics 1.3, Aristotle advances three arguments against circular proof. The third argument relies on his discussion of circular proof in Prior Analytics 2.5. This is problematic because the two chapters seem to deal with two rather disparate conceptions of circular proof. In Posterior Analytics 1.3, Aristotle gives a purely propositional account of circular proof, whereas in Prio...
متن کاملAristotle on One-Sided Possibility
The term ‘possible’, in Aristotle’s view, is ambiguous. It has two senses known as one-sided possibility and two-sided possibility (or contingency). Being two-sided possible means being neither impossible nor necessary, and being one-sided possible simply means being not impossible. Aristotle defines the two senses in Prior Analytics 1.13 (32a18–21). This definition is followed by a controversi...
متن کاملBuilding Arguments Together or Alone? Using Learning Analytics to Study the Collaborative Construction of Argument Diagrams
Research has shown that the construction of visual representations may have a positive effect on cognitive skills, including argumentation. In this paper we present a study on learning argumentation through computer-supported argument diagramming. We specifically focus on whether students, when provided with an argument-diagramming tool, create better diagrams, are more motivated, and learn mor...
متن کاملReal-Time Analytics as the Killer Application for Processing-In-Memory
While Processing-In-Memory (PIM) has been widely researched for the last two decades, it was never truly adopted by the industry and remains mostly within the academic research realm. This is mainly because (1) inmemory compute engines were too slow, and (2) a realworld application that could really benefit from PIM was never identified. In recent years, the first argument became untenable, but...
متن کاملBig Data Analytics and Now-casting: A Comprehensive Model for Eventuality of Forecasting and Predictive Policies of Policy-making Institutions
The ability of now-casting and eventuality is the most crucial and vital achievement of big data analytics in the area of policy-making. To recognize the trends and to render a real image of the current condition and alarming immediate indicators, the significance and the specific positions of big data in policy-making are undeniable. Moreover, the requirement for policy-making institutions to ...
متن کامل